The post with the most page views on this blog is “The Real Face of Jesus?” which is based on the HISTORY channel special. This maybe because both believers and unbelievers alike are interested to see what’s probably the most accurate image ever made of Jesus.
The creative team behind the awesome images are the graphic artists from Studio Macbeth headed by Ray Downing. Upon visiting their website, I found out that they have made new renderings based on the Shroud of Turin.
HISTORY channel also collaborated once again with Studio Macbeth for a new special titled “Jesus: The Lost Forty Days”. While the new visuals are stunning, the same cannot be said of the documentary. The running time is overly extended by rehashed content from “The Real Face of Jesus”. The documentary also jumps on the “Da Vinci Code” bandwagon and gives too much attention and credence to the heresy of Gnosticism and the so-called gnostic gospels. We must remember that the early Christian Church, naturally the best judge of which stories about and which teachings of Jesus were authentic, condemned the gnostic or “lost” gospels as heretical. Nevertheless, the new images depicting our Lord are worth seeing.
All images courtesy of:
www.raydowning.com
www.history.com
Monday, November 5, 2012
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Quote of the Dei (# 7)
| photo courtesy of jessilicious6 |
"Faith is what gets you started.
Hope
is what keeps you going.
Love
is what brings you to the end."
–
Mother Angelica
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Why I’m Opposed To The Reproductive Health Bill (Part 4)
| photo courtesy of AnnuskA - AnnA Theodora |
Conclusion
- Plurality of Society
Some Catholics, perhaps wanting to play safe, say “I’m personally opposed to the RH Bill, but I don’t want to impose my beliefs on others”. On moral issues however, we simply must have the courage to take a stand. For example, we cannot say “I’m personally opposed to murdering innocents but I don’t want to impose my beliefs on others”. While we acknowledge pluralism, we must also have the integrity and conviction to stand up for our beliefs.
- Hypocrisy
At times during discussions regarding the bill, we hear those in favor accuse those opposed of hypocrisy. I believe hypocrisy deserves to be discussed in an entry of its own, but in the meantime I’d like to share a quote from philosopher Peter Kreeft on the subject:
“…if a Catholic comes to believe the Church is in error in some essential, officially defined doctrine, it is a mortal sin against conscience, a sin of hypocrisy, for him to remain in the Church and call himself a Catholic…”
I agree and also think that while an “honest believer” is best, an “honest unbeliever” is better than a “dishonest believer”. Perhaps now is an opportune time for us Catholics to seriously reflect on our own beliefs.
- Cafeteria Catholics
Religious demographics of the Philippines show that 80% of Filipinos are Catholics. Ironically, surveys also show that 80% of Filipinos are in favor of the RH Bill and want it passed into law. This is a clear indication that the Philippines is a country of Catholics only in name but not in practice.
What makes us Catholic? Millions of Filipino Catholics mourned the passing of Pope John Paul II, but shedding tears at the death of a saint doesn’t make one Catholic; mere sentimental reasons won’t suffice – we must also heed the wisdom of their words and live by their example. Let us therefore be faithful to the church’s teachings on sexual morality.
A good thing that is coming out of these discussions is that we’re given the opportunity to discover the real depth of our faith or lack thereof.
Do we believe the Church simply because that’s what our Lord Jesus Christ asks of us?Now is a good time for each of us to reflect on our personal beliefs. It’s also a time for us to remember: that to be Catholic means we must accept, not just some, not just most, but all of our Lord Jesus Christ teachings, revealed and made known through His bride and our mother, the Church; that we cannot have Easter without Good Friday; that we cannot have Christ without His cross.
Do we believe the Church only when we agree with her teachings?
Do we believe the Church only when it’s easy for us to do so?
“…if, of the things taught by the Church, he holds what he chooses to hold, and rejects what he chooses to reject, he no longer adheres to the teaching of the Church as to an infallible rule, but to his own will.” – St. Thomas Aquinas
Part 4
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Why I’m Opposed To The Reproductive Health Bill (Part 3)
| photo courtesy of TARIQ-M |
Arguments Commonly Used By The Reproductive Health Bill Supporters
- “The Catholic Church does nothing (or very little) to address the problem of poverty in the country.”
It’s everyone’s responsibility to help alleviate the suffering of their countrymen, not just the government nor the church’s. While all faithful are called to perform works of mercy (feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, etc.), we must remember that our Mother Church’s main mandate is to save souls – and this is exactly what she’s doing by opposing the bill.
- “Passing the RH Bill is essential for the country’s economic growth.”
Unless problems such as rampant corruption and lack of discipline are first addressed, any development would be improbable. But even granting (without accepting) that the bill is vital in solving the country’s economic woes, should we pay for it with our souls? The church has always taught us that “the end does not justify the means”. Pope Paul VI, preaching against the use of contraceptives, stated the same in Humanae Vitae: “it is never lawful, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil that good may come of it.” (18)
- “RH Bill promotes responsible sexual behavior.”
A closer look into the issue indicates the opposite; contraceptives are used by people who want to have sex minus the responsibility. In this way, both men and women are treated as mere objects and sex is viewed as merely an activity for one’s own pleasure. Thus, a culture of contraception actually promotes sexual irresponsibility and promiscuity.
- “RH Bill has nothing to do with abortion.”
While the bill states that abortion is a crime, it contradicts itself by promoting the use of abortifacients such as IUD. Even in ideologies espoused we can see a connection, for we often hear supporters of the bill claim that “RH bill is about freedom of choice” – and once again we hear the misuse of the word “choice”, also a favorite misdeed of the “Pro-Choice/Abortion” movement. Some supporters even go so far as to call for the legalization of abortion in the country. Such acts give further credence to fears that the bill is merely the camel’s nose and once passed, abortion, its body, will soon follow inside the tent. What does abortion have to do with contraception? Everything, for abortion is simply backup contraception.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Why I’m Opposed To The Reproductive Health Bill (Part 2)
| photo courtesy of maremaremare |
Catholic Teaching on Sexual Morality
Like any good parent, the Church reminds her children not only what is forbidden but also why it is so. To understand why contraception is immoral, we need to remember our Church’s teachings on the essence and meaning of sex.
- Sex is sacred.
This has often been said but what does it mean? We say this mainly because through sex, God creates the miracle of life; through sex, God made co-creators of husband and wife. Therefore, to use contraceptives, is to contracept not only God’s creative powers but ultimately, God Himself.
- Sex is for procreation.
We need to remember that the natural purpose of sex is for procreation. Sex, if we let nature takes its course, creates babies – new persons with immortal souls. Therefore, to hinder conception by the use of contraceptives is a perversion of nature.
- Sex is an act of spousal love.
During sex, spouses mutually surrender themselves to one another; 9 months later, the love between husband and wife becomes another person. In Theology of the Body, Pope John Paul II tells us that in a profound way, sex, as an act of spousal love, mirrors the eternal exchange of love within the Blessed Trinity. Therefore, the use of contraceptives reduces sex from an expression of agape to that of mere pleasure; from an act of selflessness to that of selfishness; from a reflection of the Divine Love to that of an animal impulse.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Friday, September 28, 2012
Why I’m Opposed To The Reproductive Health Bill (Part 1)
| photo courtesy of xlynx |
Teaching Authority of the Church
The Magisterium has always, that is, from the very beginning, condemned the use of contraceptives as a sin.
- According to the Catechism (summary of Catholic beliefs):
“…“every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible” is intrinsically evil…” (2370)Moreover, 2 essential encyclicals further expounds on the immorality of contraceptives:
- Humanae Vitae (Pope Paul VI)
“Similarly excluded is any action which either before, at the moment of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end or as a means.” (14)
- Theology of the Body (Pope John Paul II)
“Two actions that are ethically different, indeed, even opposed, derive from this: the natural regulation of fertility is morally correct; contraception is not morally correct.” (118 – Faithfulness to the Divine Plan in the Transmission of Life)These are just a few of the many Church teachings condemning the use of contraceptives. One would expect these to be definitive enough to settle the issue, yet some Catholics, including few members of the clergy, still question the Church’s teachings on contraceptives. Further reflection would lead one to remember the fact that heresies have always been a part of the Church’s history. To my mind, there is no doubt that the greatest heresies of this day and age are those concerning sex and consequently, contraceptives.
Our Mother Church’s teachings are very old; in fact, she teaches us nothing new, but merely interprets the lessons given by her Divine Founder. Therefore, due to its divine origins, her teachings are constant and unchanging. Contrary to what some may believe, her stance on controversial issues such as homosexual marriage, female priestesses, abortion and contraceptives doesn’t rest on having a “liberal” Pope or not; the Vicar of Christ can only affirm but can neither abolish nor alter the commandments given by Christ Himself. She is faithful, not fickle; her teachings concern only with the Truth, not with what’s deemed “politically correct”. As Pope Benedict XVI said, “What was true yesterday is true also today”.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Saturday, August 18, 2012
An Angel Named Job
![]() |
| 2008 |
To
see anyone in pain is difficult, but the sight of a child undergoing much suffering
is hard to bear. I first heard of Job McCully's story via an episode of Extreme
Makeover: Home Edition – one of the few, “food for the soul” types of show on TV.
I’m not much for sentimentality, but the story of this boy's pain and suffering just broke my heart.
Before leukemia:
Job
was only 4 years old in 2002 when he was diagnosed with leukemia and given less
than 10% chance of survival. After receiving chemotherapy and a bone marrow
transplant, he was eventually able to beat the cancer. However, because of the
treatment, he developed fungal pneumonia which caused severe damage to his
lungs. At one point, his heart stopped beating for 8 minutes but he
miraculously survived. In
2007, he underwent a double lung transplant surgery. While the operation was a
success, there was only so much pain and suffering Job’s little body could
take. He developed cataracts in both eyes and was confined to a wheelchair. His
medications contributed to an excessive weight gain and a bloated appearance. His
immune system has become very fragile and he also now has diabetes.
![]() |
| with dad Robert |
![]() |
| with mom Tina |
![]() |
| with grandma Glenda |
![]() |
| physical therapy |
![]() |
| taking meds |
“He’s
been such an inspiration to so many people. And he’s only 10 years old.”
– Robert,
Job’s dad
Yet,
in spite of all the pain and suffering Job underwent and is still undergoing
through, he still manages to smile – and a more beautiful sight one will never
see. His courage and will to survive is rarely seen in anyone, much less that
of a child. Job has become an inspiration and a symbol of hope to everyone who
hears his story. Job is my hero.
| thumbs up |
After
doing some research, I was happy to find out that Job’s health is continuing to
improve and he is now able to walk. Like his biblical namesake who also underwent severe tribulations, I pray that God will continue to bless “Job's
latter condition even more than his former one” (Job 42:12) and that little Job
will live until he’s “old and full of days” (Job 42:17).
“How
can you be more blessed, than to appreciate those precious moments that other
people take for granted?”
– Tina, Job’s mom
![]() |
| Angel Job |
*
Photos and Videos:
Have
you ever seen an angel smile?
with sister Nicole
more recent
![]() |
| The McCully's |
![]() |
| 2nd Place Regional Spelling Bee |
![]() |
| lovin' the rain |
![]() |
| happy birthday |
Extreme Makeover: Home Edition (clip)
Camping, Roasting Marshmallows and Pirates
Do you know what the word hero means?
*
Courtesy of:
For
more, please visit:
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Maximilian Maria Kolbe – The Saint of Auschwitz
![]() |
| St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe |
1894 –
January 7, 1894: Maximilian Maria Kolbe was born Raymond Kolbe in Zdunska-Wola, Poland to
a poor family. Both his parents were weavers – his father, Julius Kolbe, later joined the army and fought for Polish independence from Russia; his mother, Maria Dubrowska, later became a Benedictine nun. He was the 2nd child
in a family of 3 children – like him, his brother Alphonse would also become a priest.
![]() |
| Maria Dubrowska |
![]() |
| 7 Years Old |
1906 –
In
the town of Pabianice, Poland, the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to the 12
year old Maximilian. In his words:
“That night I asked
the Mother of God what was to become of me.
Then she came to me
holding two crowns, one white, and the other red.
She asked if I was
willing to accept either of these crowns.
The white one meant
that I should persevere in purity and the red that I should become a martyr.
I said that I would
accept them both.”
1907 – Entered the preparatory
seminary of the Conventual Franciscans
in Lwow (Ukraine).
![]() |
| Parish Choir (1907) |
1910 – Became a novice at
the age of 16 and received his name in the Order, Maximilian.
1911 – September 5, 1911: made his first, “simple” vows.
1912 – November, 1912: began the study of
philosophy at the Pontifical Gregorian
University in Rome, Italy.
1914 –
November 1, 1914: Maximilian took his
final, "solemn" vows of poverty,
chastity and obedience. He also took the names Maximilian Maria to show his
devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
On
the same year, his father was hanged by the Russians for treason.
1915 – October 22, 1915: obtained his Doctorate in Philosophy.
1917 –
October 16, 1917: the young
seminarian gathered 6 of his friends in a room at their seminary in Rome's Via San Teodoro to establish the
Militia Immaculatae (Immaculata
Movement) – a movement devoted to the conversion of sinners through the
intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
On
the same year, he began showing signs of suffering from tuberculosis, a disease
which nearly killed him and caused him to be frail for the rest of his life.
1918 –
April 28, 1918: Maximilian was
ordained a priest in Rome at the age
of 24. The next day, he celebrated his first mass in the Basilica of Sant'Andrea delle Fratte at the “Altar of the Miracle”.
| 1918 |
1919 –
July 22, 1919: Fr. Maximilian
obtained his Doctorate in Theology from
the Pontifical Theological Faculty of
St. Bonaventure in Rome, Italy.
A Marian devotee, he also composed the Immaculata
– a prayer of consecration to the immaculately conceived Blessed Virgin Mary;
his insights into the Immaculate
Conception will later influence the Marian
theology of the Second Vatican
Council.
1922 – Further spread the
Movement through publishing “The Knight
of the Immaculata” magazine.
1927 – Founded the Niepokalanow (City of the Immaculate
Mother of God) monastery in Teresin,
Poland; the community will soon grow to become one of the largest monasteries
in the world at that time.
1930 –
Fr.
Maximilian travelled to Asia to
further spread the Movement.
April 24, 1930: he and his
companions landed in Nagasaki, Japan.
Despite arriving penniless and not speaking a word of Japanese, he began
printing “Seibo no Kishi”, the
Japanese version of “The Knight of the
Immaculata” within a month.
| 1930 |
1931 –
Fr.
Maximilian founded a monastery, Mugenzai
no Sono (Garden of the Immaculate), on the slopes of Mt. Hikosan in Nagasaki,
Japan. His choice of location to build the monastery was ridiculed by many –
some thought it was unwise to build on the mountainside facing away from the
town; others said it was bad “feng shui”
according to local Shinto beliefs. Fr.
Maximilian’s choice, however, would later prove to be providential (see 1945).
Later
on, he would also travel to India to
further spread the Movement.
1936 –
Fr.
Maximilian returned to Poland
because of poor health. Meanwhile, “Seibo
no Kishi” circulation grew to 65,000.
1939 –
September 1, 1939: Nazi Germany invaded Poland marking the start of World War 2.
September 19, 1939: Fr. Maximilian was
arrested for the first time and imprisoned.
December 8, 1939: On the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, Fr.
Maximilian and the other friars were released from prison and returned to Niepokalanow
the next day where they began to organize a shelter for 3,000 Polish refugees – 2,000 of whom were Jews.
![]() |
| Document issued by the German authorities (1940) |
1941 –
February 17, 1941: Fr. Maximilian was
arrested again and imprisoned at Pawiak
in Warsaw, Poland where he was
subjected to cruel treatment by the Gestapo.
May 28, 1941: Fr. Maximilian was transported
via trainload of prisoners to Auschwitz
Concentration Camp where he was branded/tattooed “Prisoner No. 16670”. He was specially hated by his captors for 2 reasons:
being 1) Polish and 2) a Catholic Priest. Despite being ill, he was assigned
the hardest of tasks and many times was tortured until he passed out. During one
such incident, after being beaten and lashed by his captors, he was thrown in
the mud and left for dead. He was smuggled by his companions to the camp
hospital where he recovered. Upon returning to camp, Fr. Maximilian wasted no
time resuming his ministry to his fellow prisoners by hearing confessions and
celebrating mass.
July 28 – August 1,
1941:
During this period, a prisoner from Fr. Maximilian’s block (Block 14) vanished,
prompting the Deputy Camp Commander, SS-Hauptsturmführer Karl Fritzsch, to sentence 10 prisoners from the same barracks to
death in retaliation.
Karl
Fritzsch: “The fugitive has not been
found! You will all pay for this. 10 of you will be locked in the starvation
bunker without food or water until they die!”
One
of the selected men, Franciszek
Gajowniczek, imprisoned for helping the Polish Resistance, cried out: “My poor wife! My poor children! What will
happen to my family?”
Upon
hearing this, Fr. Maximilian took off his cap and silently stepped forward.
Karl
Fritzsch: “What does this Polish pig
want?”
Fr.
Maximilian: “I am only a Catholic priest
from Poland. Let me take his place. I am old. He has a wife and children.”
According
to a witness:
“From astonishment, the
commandant appeared unable to speak. After a moment, he gave a sign with his
hand. He spoke but one word: ‘Away!’ Gajowniczek received the command to return
to the row he had just left. In this manner, Fr. Maximilian took the place of
the condemned man.”
As
the 10 were led off to basement bunker of Block
13 to die, Fr. Maximilian supported a fellow prisoner who could hardly
walk.
![]() |
| Karl Fritzsch |
![]() |
| Franciszek Gajowniczek |
August 14, 1941: After weeks of
starvation, Fr. Maximilian and his fellow prisoners were barely alive. Some
were so thirsty that they resorted to drinking their own urine. Yet, not a
sound of anguish was heard to come from the bunker; instead there were those of
prayers and hymns by the prisoners led by Fr. Maximilian. Finally, the Nazi officials
decided that the cell had to cleared-out to make room for other prisoners. As
the executioner entered the bunker, Fr. Maximilian, the only one left who was
fully conscious, said a prayer and offered his left arm to be injected with a
lethal dose of carbolic acid. On the eve of the Feast of the Assumption of
the one whom he devotedly loved all his life, Maximilian died.
1945 –
August 9, 1945: the United States dropped an atomic bomb on
Nagasaki, Japan. Mugenzai no Sono
sustained minimal damage, with the other side of the mountain on which it was
built taking the worst of the blast. It remains one of the most prominent
monasteries in Japan until this day.
1969 – January 30, 1969: Pope Paul VI approved the heroic virtues of Fr. Maximilian and
declared him “Venerable”
1971 – October 17, 1971: Pope Paul VI beatified Fr. Maximilian as “Confessor” at St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Italy
1982 – October 10, 1982: Pope John
Paul II canonized Fr. Maximilian, his compatriot, a saint and “Martyr of Charity”.
![]() |
| Pope John Paul II and Franciszek Gajowniczek at the canonization of St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe (1982) |
Every August 14 (St. Maximilian Maria
Kolbe’s feast day), until
his death on March 13, 1995, Franciszek Gajowniczek went back to
Auschwitz to commemorate the life of the saint who died on his behalf.
| Franciszek Gajowniczek (1995) |
(John 15:13)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














































